Kim Kardashian reveals her new Rolling Stone magazine cover to her Instagram followers

Kim Kardashian made every single newspaper, magazine and website headline in November last year when she revealed her completely nude Paper Magazine cover to the world, and it's fair to say, it divided anyone and everyones opinion of her. 

However, not content with just one jaw-dropping cover in her repertoire, the 34-year-old Keeping Up With The Kardashians star has secured another high profile mag shoot which has, once again, broken the internet. 

This time Kimmy has decided, for the most part, to keep her clothes on but she still manages to make our eyes pop with THIS shot. Gracing the cover of iconic Rolling Stone, Kim teamed up with Terry Richardson — a photographer known for, for the lack of a better word, his laddish style — to come up trumps with this very NSFW cover. And here it is... 

Working a sailor's hat and a nautical striped vest top strategically pulled down to reveal a red satin Agent Provocateur push-up bra, one thing's for sure; this girl's got front. In both meanings of the word. We'll be honest — we can't stop staring at her boobs. They're mesmerising... 

The only other image Kimmy has shared from the shoot features her wearing a one-piece swimsuit with an unzipped motif to the front, accessorising only with her HUGE diamond engagement ring. With a rock of that magnitude, it's not like she needs much else, is it? 

Of course, the accompanying interview to the photo shoot is just as shocking as the pictures themselves as Kim talks candidly (how else?) about her first secret marriage, *that* sex tape and how her relationship with Caitlyn Jenner has evolved. We don't know about you, but this is one read we don't want to miss out on.

Ironically enough, the revealing of her latest sexy cover came literally hours after she gave a talk about the objectification of women in the media. Trust us, this makes for interesting reading.

Now, lets all try and stop looking at Kim's breasts and get back to work, shall we?